Practice question
Principal publicly advertises the specified power under 1873. A third person relies within that published scope, and no effective rescission is established. Principal says the representation can never have authority consequences because it was public. Which is best?
- Public representation is expressly irrelevant in every case.
- The provision expressly gives the public representation its stated effect toward third persons.
- Any third person may invent unlimited authority beyond the notice.
- The advertisement automatically transfers every principal asset.
- Only the printer becomes the agent.
Legal references
- Civil Code Articles1649-1652,1663-1668,1870-1875,1890-1893 and1921-1932: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.