Practice question
A recipient argues that restitution is impossible in every case without a signed bilateral contract, even where the Civil Code establishes a quasi-contract from the qualifying acts. Which is correct?
- The lack of a bilateral agreement does not defeat a legally established quasi-contract merely for that reason
- Every claim requires a notarized contract
- Quasi-contracts are only ordinary signed contracts
- Only corporate recipients have obligations
- A signature always converts every benefit into a gift
Legal references
- Civil Code, Article 2142: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/53360
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.