Philippine Bar review · Topic
Nuisance
Explore Nuisance in PROPERTY, OWNERSHIP, AND ITS MODIFICATIONS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What distinguishes a public nuisance under Article 695?
- Does lapse of time legalize an otherwise established nuisance?
- Does abatement of a nuisance necessarily eliminate an injured person’s claim for damage caused by its past existence?
- A buyer learns of a nuisance on the purchased premises that was started by the seller and refuses to abate it. Can the …
- A public nuisance causes special injury to a particular resident beyond the general community effect. May that resident…
- Residents dispute whether noise from a lawful basketball facility is unreasonable in its actual location and operating …
- A homeowner demands removal of an alleged private nuisance. The demand is rejected, but she obtains no required health-…
- Distinguish public from private nuisance and explain the specially injured private person’s position.
- Explain why an alleged nuisance per accidens cannot simply be summarily demolished by attaching a nuisance label.
- A new possessor refuses to abate an established nuisance created by the former owner. Later abatement occurs. Discuss c…
- Under701, who commences the specified civil action for maintenance of a public nuisance?
- Under702’s text, who determines whether extrajudicial abatement is the best public-nuisance remedy?