Practice question
A litigant invokes the ordinary party-wall presumption while refusing to let the court consider an authenticated contrary title and the statutory exterior signs. Which is correct?
- The presumption excludes all other evidence
- The court must consider the contrary title, signs, and proof rather than apply the presumption as conclusive
- Only oral preference is relevant
- A title can never concern a wall
- Every presumption is irrebuttable
Legal references
- Civil Code, Articles617,631,639-647,652-657,658-673 and688-693: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.