Practice question
A co-owner invokes488 to renounce an equivalent share instead of contributing preservation costs, but the proposed waiver is proved prejudicial to co-ownership. Which is correct?
- 488 prohibits that prejudicial waiver
- Any renunciation automatically overrides the prohibition
- Every co-owner must waive all ownership
- The expenditure becomes the neighbor’s debt
- Prejudice is expressly irrelevant
Legal references
- Civil Code RA386: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html Articles486,488–489 and498.
- RA7899 condominium amendments: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1995/ra_7899_1995.html Section1, amended4726 Section4 voting basis.
- RA4726 Condominium Act: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1966/ra_4726_1966.html as amended.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.