Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Accion Reivindicatoria

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A2026 ownership-recovery complaint omits assessed value in its body, but its annexed official declaration clearly states the disputed parcel's assessed value of PHP250,000. No special rule applies. Which is best?
  1. The court must ignore every annex by definition.
  2. The PHP250,000 figure must automatically be treated as 25 million.
  3. The annex conclusively proves every ownership issue too.
  4. Consider the annex-based qualification; omission from the body alone is not automatically fatal.
  5. No property-recovery action can ever be filed.

Legal references

  • Civil Code Articles434,583-590,622-624 and631: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
  • RA11576 Sections1-2, current assessed-value allocation: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11576_2021.html
  • Spouses Veloso v. BDO, G.R.256924, June14,2023, MAIN, assessed-value allegation and annexes in real actions: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/jun2023/gr_256924_2023.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.