Practice question
A lessor relying only on nonpayment demands payment but never makes the required demand to vacate, and no stipulation or exception dispenses with it. It claims title ownership alone supplies the omitted communication. Which is best?
- Ownership automatically satisfies every missing ejectment step.
- The stated demand requirements cannot be replaced solely by proof of title.
- Any unrelated letter always equals a vacate demand.
- A lease default never needs legal requirements.
- The tenant's appearance automatically proves all omitted facts.
Legal references
- 2019 Civil Procedure Rules, Rule70 Section2: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.pdf
- Limbauan v. Acosta, G.R.148606, June30,2008, MAIN, demand-to-filing interval: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_148606_2008.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.