Practice question
A party’s historical mental condition is established, but the parties stipulate the contract was made during a genuine lucid interval with all other requisites satisfied. What is correct?
- The historical condition alone does not defeat the expressly recognized lucid-interval contract
- Any diagnosis permanently invalidates every transaction
- Only the name of the condition matters
- Every transaction must be presumed criminal
- The contract becomes void because an heir objects
Legal references
- Civil Code RA386: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html Articles1328,1330 and1332.
- Alamayri v Pabale GR151243 April30,2008 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/apr2008/gr_151243_2008.html MAIN burden, distinct guardianship and contract-capacity inquiries.
- Almeda v Heirs of Almeda GR194189 September14,2017 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/sep2017/gr_194189_2017.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.