Practice question
Under Pasig Rizal’s reading of the amendment, is a further express State declaration that proven alienable and disposable land is no longer retained for public purposes invariably required for this confirmation route?
- Always
- Only if the owner is poor
- No; the amended framework removes that additional manifestation requirement
- Only after a donation
- Only if no neighbor objects
Legal references
- Republic v. Pasig Rizal Co., Inc., G.R. No.213207, February 15, 2022, MAIN en banc decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/feb2022/gr_213207_2022.html
- RA11573, Sections5-7, amended CA141 Section 48 and PD1529 Section 14: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11573_2021.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.