Practice question
A claimant adds ten early years to ten recent years but admits a substantial intervening break in the required possession. No war, force-majeure exception, or other qualifying explanation is established. Does arithmetic alone establish the amended route?
- Yes, any scattered twenty years suffice
- No; continuous possession and the immediately-preceding-filing requirement must be met
- Yes, interruption is never relevant
- Only the number of tax receipts matters
- The applicant may select any twenty dates
Legal references
- RA11573, Sections5-7, amended CA141 Section 48 and PD1529 Section 14: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11573_2021.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.