Practice question
Evidence shows grave manifestations only became visible years after the wedding, but clear and convincing evidence connects them to the durable pre-marital personality structure and incapacity already existing at celebration. The opponent says late visibility alone categorically defeats 36. Which is best?
- The incapacity must exist at celebration, but later manifestation does not alone negate that established antecedence.
- Every manifestation must be publicly visible at the ceremony.
- Any later manifestation necessarily proves a post-marital origin.
- The wedding photographer alone determines incapacity.
- Timing is wholly irrelevant under 36.
Legal references
- Family Code Articles36,65-67,79-80,86 and134-138: https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo1987/eo_209_1987.html
- Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R.196359, May11,2021, EN BANC MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/may2021/gr_196359_2021.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.