Practice question
A mixed-nationality couple obtains a divorce through the foreign jurisdiction's legally valid mutual-agreement procedure. All applicable recognition requirements are established. Is the absence of a contested judicial trial by itself a categorical bar under Ng and Galapon?
- No; validity under the applicable foreign framework and the recognition requirements matter, not a universal demand for an adversarial court trial
- Yes, every divorce must copy Philippine annulment procedure
- Yes, mutual agreement necessarily means fraud
- Yes, the foreign jurisdiction may never allow administrative divorce
- Yes, only witnesses' preferences decide
Legal references
- Family Code Articles26 and68–73: https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo1987/eo_209_1987.html
- Republic v. Manalo, GR221029, April24 2018, main resolution: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2018/apr2018/gr_221029_2018.html
- Galapon v. Republic, GR243722, January22 2020, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/jan2020/gr_243722_2020.html
- Republic v. Ng, GR249238, February27 2024, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/feb2024/gr_249238_2024.html
- Anido v. Republic, GR253527, October21 2024, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/oct2024/gr_253527_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.