Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Grounds to Impugn Legitimacy

Explore Grounds to Impugn Legitimacy in Legitimated Children for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under Article 182, who may impugn a child’s legitimation? Multiple Choice Easy
  2. What period does Article 182 prescribe for impugning legitimation? Multiple Choice Easy
  3. Under Boquiren, may legitimated status ordinarily be attacked merely as a collateral issue in an unrelated proceeding? Multiple Choice Easy
  4. An otherwise eligible child’s parents were both below eighteen at conception, with no other impediment, and later valid… Multiple Choice Medium
  5. At the child’s conception, one parent was validly married to a third person. That marriage later ended, and the biologi… Multiple Choice Medium
  6. Adult children file a correction petition to downgrade their own legitimated status, asserting only that they prefer no… Multiple Choice Hard
  7. A relative files a petition styled as correction of a spelling error but actually seeks cancellation of a child’s legit… Multiple Choice Hard
  8. Explain the substantive basis for challenging legitimation where statutory eligibility or the required subsequent valid… Essay Medium
  9. State Article 182’s standing and timing rules and explain why the child’s birth is not automatically the accrual date i… Essay Medium
  10. Using Boquiren, explain why a petition labeled correction of entries cannot automatically avoid the rules governing an … Essay Medium
  11. Does Tangarorang treat every nullity case as an impermissible collateral correction-of-entry case merely because a chil… Multiple Choice Easy
  12. In an Article 36 nullity case like Tangarorang, is psychological incapacity itself a ground automatically to downgrade … Multiple Choice Easy