Practice question
A child whose prior adoption was rescinded is considered for a new adoption by qualified applicants. An objector argues that rescission imposes a permanent statutory ban on every later adoption. Which is the best response?
- The objection is correct under Section 22(f).
- Section 22(f) expressly includes the child; a new adoption still depends on all applicable qualifications and process.
- The new applicants automatically become parents without any order.
- The prior rescission conclusively proves every new applicant qualified.
- The child must remain unadopted regardless of welfare or law.
Legal references
- RA11642 Section22, Who May Be Adopted; https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11642_2022.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.