Practice question
A person invokes Article 6's permission to waive rights but intentionally omits the rest of the article. On stipulated facts, the proposed waiver violates public order and good customs. The person says a clear signature cures every objection. Which conclusion follows?
- The signature necessarily cures every public-order defect.
- The article must be applied with its limitations; the stated waiver is not validated merely by clear consent.
- Article 6 permits waiver only when no one signs.
- Public order is relevant only to foreign contracts.
- Good customs can never affect waiver validity.
Legal references
- Civil Code Article6; https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.