Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Repeal and Nullification of Laws; Operative Fact Doctrine

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A mandatory statute remains in force, but a business proves that many competitors have ignored it for years. Does that custom alone excuse its violation under Article 7?
  1. Yes, widespread violations repeal the statute
  2. Yes, business practice always prevails
  3. Yes, if a competitor benefits
  4. Yes, unless a new statute repeats the same rule
  5. No, contrary custom or practice does not by itself excuse nonobservance

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html — Civil Code, Article 7
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2007/aug2007/gr_162155_2007.html — CIR v. Primetown Property Group, Inc., G.R. No. 162155, August 28, 2007, repeal by irreconcilable inconsistency
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jun2024/gr_260458_2024.html — Hagedorn v. COA, G.R. No. 260458, June 4, 2024, main opinion, qualified operative fact doctrine

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.