Philippine Bar review · Topic
Jurisdiction; Forum Non Conveniens
Explore Jurisdiction; Forum Non Conveniens in Conflict of Laws for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What is the basic character of forum non conveniens in a case with foreign elements?
- Which is relevant when a Philippine court decides whether it should assume jurisdiction despite a forum non conveniens …
- Does identifying foreign elements alone automatically divest a Philippine court of jurisdiction?
- A Philippine court has jurisdiction over a contract dispute. A party objects solely because the agreement states paymen…
- A contract dispute may require application of foreign law. The Philippine court otherwise has jurisdiction. Which state…
- A Malaysian creditor sues a Philippine corporation here for reimbursement under an agreement executed and performed in …
- In a cross-border dispute, several witnesses and documents are abroad, but other material evidence and enforceable asse…
- Distinguish lack of jurisdiction from declining to exercise jurisdiction on forum non conveniens grounds.
- Identify the principal considerations PNCC discusses for a Philippine court assuming jurisdiction despite a forum non c…
- Why must a cross-border dispute distinguish the competent forum from the substantive law governing the claim?
- When does PNCC's discussion require forum non conveniens to be clearly pleaded?
- What consequence does the quoted PNCC rule attach to failure to plead forum non conveniens at that opportunity?