Practice question
A litigant counts three minor contacts with State A and one central relationship contact with State B, then says the count conclusively selects A for every issue. Which analysis is sound under Saudia?
- The contacts must be evaluated for their significance to the issue, not merely counted
- The largest number always wins
- Only alphabetical order matters
- Every contact has equal weight by law
- No characterization is required
Legal references
- Saudi Arabian Airlines v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 122191, October 8, 1998, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1998/oct1998/gr_122191_1998.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.