Practice question
A court recognizes that a foreign limitation may be substantive and a borrowing rule may matter, but refuses to examine a supported public-policy objection merely because foreign law was proved. Which is best?
- Proof makes every foreign rule enforceable without exception.
- Proof of content and enforceability under the forum's conflicts/public-policy analysis are distinct.
- Any public-policy label automatically wins without reasons.
- Only unproved law can ever be considered.
- The forum may never characterize any rule.
Legal references
- Cadalin v. POEA, G.R.104776 and consolidated cases, December5,1994, MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/dec1994/gr_104776_1994.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.