Practice question
In IPAMS's discussion, what is generally required for a party invoking foreign law before a Philippine tribunal?
- An unsupported assertion that it exists
- A claim that every foreign rule is judicially noticed
- Pleading and proof under the applicable evidentiary rules
- Only a company logo
- Only proof that the employer is foreign
Legal references
- IPAMS v. De Vera, G.R.205703, March7 2016, main decision, contractual choice of law and lex loci contractus; https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/61749
- Civil Code Articles17 and1306; https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.