Prohibition on Collateral Attack on Personal Status through Correction of Entries

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Under Braza and Olaybar, may a civil-register correction petition simply substitute for the proper action to invalidate… Multiple Choice Easy
2. What did Olaybar distinguish from invalidating an actual marriage? Multiple Choice Easy
3. In examining whether a correction petition conceals an improper status challenge, what matters? Multiple Choice Easy
4. A person admits entering a marriage but asks the registrar simply to change married to single because the spouses no lo… Multiple Choice Medium
5. A petitioner asks through Rule 108 to invalidate a marriage as bigamous and thereby defeat a child's legitimacy, while … Multiple Choice Medium
6. A woman proves in a proper adversarial Rule 108 proceeding that another person used her identity and forged her signatu… Multiple Choice Hard
7. An heir uses a birth-entry correction petition to attack another child's legitimacy by first having a purported marriag… Multiple Choice Hard
8. Compare Braza's rejected correction petition with Olaybar's allowed correction of a forged marriage record. Essay Medium
9. Why does calling a requested personal-status change clerical or incidental not conclusively establish that Rule 108 is … Essay Medium
10. State why Olaybar should not be read as permission for anyone to dissolve an actual marriage by merely denying a regist… Essay Medium
11. Does Fujiki treat recognition of an existing foreign marriage judgment as identical to trying a new Philippine nullity … Multiple Choice Easy
12. Under Fujiki, can a properly framed Rule 108 proceeding include recognition of the relevant foreign judgment affecting … Multiple Choice Easy